person journey
Carla Del Ponte: Investigating Syria's War Crimes — Then Quitting in Disgust
Carla Del Ponte had prosecuted war criminals across three continents. In 2017 she said Syria had defeated her — not because the evidence wasn't there, but because the political will wasn't.
Confirmed2 chapters2012-09-01— 2017-08-06
The prosecutor who convicted Milošević spent five years documenting Syrian war crimes — then resigned from the UN Commission saying the world had failed Syria.
01
Chapter 01custom01 / 02
The Commission of Inquiry on Syria: 2012–2017
In 2012, the UN Human Rights Council established the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Syrian Arab Republic — tasked with investigating all alleged violations of international humanitarian law and international human rights law in Syria since March 2011.
Carla Del Ponte was appointed to the Commission in 2012. For five years, she and her colleagues — Brazilian jurist Paulo Pinheiro and other experts — documented the crimes being committed by all parties in the Syrian conflict. The Commission produced detailed reports on:
The Assad government's systematic use of torture and extrajudicial killing in detention facilities (Branch 251, Saydnaya, others); the use of barrel bombs against civilian populations; the use of chemical weapons; the enforced disappearance of tens of thousands of people.
ISIS's genocide against the Yazidis; the beheadings of journalists and aid workers; the enslavement of women and girls.
Armed rebel factions' use of siege warfare; abductions; summary executions.
The reports were comprehensive, detailed, and devastating. They were also largely irrelevant to the actual course of the war. The UN Security Council — where Russia and China could veto any action — blocked every attempt to refer the Syria situation to the International Criminal Court. The evidence pile grew. Nothing happened.
Del Ponte grew increasingly frustrated. She had spent her career building international accountability mechanisms — seeing them applied to Yugoslavia and Rwanda. In Syria, the same mechanisms were being systematically blocked by geopolitics.
Carla Del Ponte was appointed to the Commission in 2012. For five years, she and her colleagues — Brazilian jurist Paulo Pinheiro and other experts — documented the crimes being committed by all parties in the Syrian conflict. The Commission produced detailed reports on:
The Assad government's systematic use of torture and extrajudicial killing in detention facilities (Branch 251, Saydnaya, others); the use of barrel bombs against civilian populations; the use of chemical weapons; the enforced disappearance of tens of thousands of people.
ISIS's genocide against the Yazidis; the beheadings of journalists and aid workers; the enslavement of women and girls.
Armed rebel factions' use of siege warfare; abductions; summary executions.
The reports were comprehensive, detailed, and devastating. They were also largely irrelevant to the actual course of the war. The UN Security Council — where Russia and China could veto any action — blocked every attempt to refer the Syria situation to the International Criminal Court. The evidence pile grew. Nothing happened.
Del Ponte grew increasingly frustrated. She had spent her career building international accountability mechanisms — seeing them applied to Yugoslavia and Rwanda. In Syria, the same mechanisms were being systematically blocked by geopolitics.
Confirmed(85%)Sensitivity: medium
02
Chapter 02custom02 / 02
Resignation: August 2017 — 'The World Has Abandoned Syria'
On August 6, 2017, Carla Del Ponte resigned from the UN Commission of Inquiry on Syria. Her resignation statement was an indictment: "In my position I can't do anything," she said. "I was hoping that the Security Council would finally take action against one of the parties of the Syrian conflict. But there was nothing. I am really, really appalled."
She was specific about what had failed: the Russian and Chinese vetoes blocking every attempt to refer Syria to the International Criminal Court; the unwillingness of Western powers to use the evidence the Commission had gathered to impose real consequences on the Assad government; the general abandonment of the principle that international law means something.
She had documented crimes committed by the Assad government that she believed constituted crimes against humanity. She had documented crimes by ISIS and rebel factions. She had presented this evidence repeatedly to the Security Council. Nothing had happened.
Her resignation was an act of public witness — a former chief prosecutor of international tribunals saying, on record, that the international accountability system had completely failed. Coming from someone who had successfully prosecuted Milošević, the statement carried particular weight.
It also reflected a broader truth about Syria: the gap between the volume of documented atrocities and the actual consequences imposed for those atrocities was larger than in any conflict since the post-World War II era. Hundreds of reports. Hundreds of thousands of deaths. Millions displaced. And the architects of the most extensively documented campaign of civilian killing in 21st century history remained in power — until December 2024.
She was specific about what had failed: the Russian and Chinese vetoes blocking every attempt to refer Syria to the International Criminal Court; the unwillingness of Western powers to use the evidence the Commission had gathered to impose real consequences on the Assad government; the general abandonment of the principle that international law means something.
She had documented crimes committed by the Assad government that she believed constituted crimes against humanity. She had documented crimes by ISIS and rebel factions. She had presented this evidence repeatedly to the Security Council. Nothing had happened.
Her resignation was an act of public witness — a former chief prosecutor of international tribunals saying, on record, that the international accountability system had completely failed. Coming from someone who had successfully prosecuted Milošević, the statement carried particular weight.
It also reflected a broader truth about Syria: the gap between the volume of documented atrocities and the actual consequences imposed for those atrocities was larger than in any conflict since the post-World War II era. Hundreds of reports. Hundreds of thousands of deaths. Millions displaced. And the architects of the most extensively documented campaign of civilian killing in 21st century history remained in power — until December 2024.
Confirmed(85%)Sensitivity: medium
Full Source List
01
UN Commission of Inquiry on Syria — reports 2012-2017UN Human Rights Council
Continue the Journey
Explore other journeys in this documentary archive
All Journeys