person journey
Abu Sakkar: From Protester to FSA Commander — The War's Moral Collapse
Abu Sakkar joined the uprising in 2011. In 2013, he appeared in a video that shocked the world. His story is not an aberration — it is a product of what the Syrian war did to everyone it touched.
Confirmed2 chapters2011-03-15— 2013-05-13
The trajectory of Abu Sakkar — from Homs farmer to FSA fighter to the man in the most disturbing video of the Syrian civil war — is the story of what two years of war without accountability can do to human beings.
01
Chapter 01custom01 / 02
Baba Amr, Homs — Where the Revolution Was Born and Crushed
Baba Amr is a working-class neighborhood in the western part of Homs. In 2011, it became the first neighborhood in Syria to be fully besieged and razed by the Assad government — a preview of what would later happen to Aleppo, Eastern Ghouta, and Daraa.
Khaled al-Hamad — Abu Sakkar — was from Baba Amr. He was a farmer and small businessman, not an ideological Islamist or a career soldier. When protests began in Homs in early 2011, he joined them. When the government began shooting protesters, he joined the emerging armed resistance.
The battle for Baba Amr in February 2012 was one of the most brutal episodes of the war's first year. The Assad government massed artillery and tanks around the neighborhood and bombarded it continuously for 26 days. Between February 3 and February 29, 2012, the neighborhood was shelled day and night. Buildings collapsed. Water, electricity, and food were cut. The foreign journalists Marie Colvin and Rémi Ochlik were killed in a direct strike on the media center where they were working.
On February 29, the FSA withdrew from Baba Amr and regime forces entered. They found a largely rubbled neighborhood. The population had fled or been killed. Human rights organizations documented that regime soldiers and shabiha militiamen executed civilians who had not managed to escape — mass executions that were later confirmed by multiple survivor accounts and by photographs.
Abu Sakkar survived Baba Amr. He continued fighting as a commander in Homs Province. He had, by 2013, witnessed or participated in nearly two years of a war in which he had seen his neighborhood destroyed, his community killed, and his comrades tortured and executed if captured. He had also seen the Assad government commit atrocities with complete impunity — chemical weapons, barrel bombs, mass executions — while the world watched and did nothing.
Khaled al-Hamad — Abu Sakkar — was from Baba Amr. He was a farmer and small businessman, not an ideological Islamist or a career soldier. When protests began in Homs in early 2011, he joined them. When the government began shooting protesters, he joined the emerging armed resistance.
The battle for Baba Amr in February 2012 was one of the most brutal episodes of the war's first year. The Assad government massed artillery and tanks around the neighborhood and bombarded it continuously for 26 days. Between February 3 and February 29, 2012, the neighborhood was shelled day and night. Buildings collapsed. Water, electricity, and food were cut. The foreign journalists Marie Colvin and Rémi Ochlik were killed in a direct strike on the media center where they were working.
On February 29, the FSA withdrew from Baba Amr and regime forces entered. They found a largely rubbled neighborhood. The population had fled or been killed. Human rights organizations documented that regime soldiers and shabiha militiamen executed civilians who had not managed to escape — mass executions that were later confirmed by multiple survivor accounts and by photographs.
Abu Sakkar survived Baba Amr. He continued fighting as a commander in Homs Province. He had, by 2013, witnessed or participated in nearly two years of a war in which he had seen his neighborhood destroyed, his community killed, and his comrades tortured and executed if captured. He had also seen the Assad government commit atrocities with complete impunity — chemical weapons, barrel bombs, mass executions — while the world watched and did nothing.
Confirmed(85%)Sensitivity: medium
02
Chapter 02custom02 / 02
May 2013: The Video — and What It Meant
On May 13, 2013, a video appeared online showing a man identified as Abu Sakkar — by his voice, his face, and testimony from people who knew him — standing over the body of a dead Syrian soldier. He had cut open the soldier's chest. He appeared to bite or eat an organ — described in most reports as the heart, though some forensic analysts suggested it might have been a lung.
While cutting, he spoke to the camera: 'I swear to God we will eat your hearts and your livers, you soldiers of Bashar the dog.'
The video was authenticated by Human Rights Watch and multiple media organizations. Abu Sakkar subsequently confirmed to Time magazine that it was him, and explained his reasoning: he said he had found audio recordings on the soldier's phone showing the soldier had participated in torture of civilians, and that this was his response.
The global reaction was immediate and intense. The Assad government — which had by this point used chemical weapons, barrel bombs, and conducted industrial-scale torture in its detention system — used the video to argue that the opposition were terrorists and barbarians. Western governments, which had been debating arming the FSA, cited the video as evidence that the opposition included extremists who could not be trusted with weapons. The FSA's official leadership condemned the act.
Human Rights Watch published a statement condemning the act as a war crime: desecration of a body is prohibited under international humanitarian law regardless of the crimes the dead person may have committed.
Abu Sakkar's explanation — that he had found recordings proving the soldier had tortured people — did not justify what he did, but it placed it in context: this was not a man who had joined the war to commit atrocities. This was a man who had been destroyed by the war, who had lost his neighborhood, his community, and his moral compass in two years of fighting a government that committed far larger atrocities against far more people with far less provocation — and with complete impunity.
The video encapsulated a central truth about the Syrian war: the Assad government's strategy of overwhelming brutality was not only destroying Syrian society physically — it was destroying it morally, producing responses that further undermined the opposition's international legitimacy and gave the regime propaganda tools to use against them.
While cutting, he spoke to the camera: 'I swear to God we will eat your hearts and your livers, you soldiers of Bashar the dog.'
The video was authenticated by Human Rights Watch and multiple media organizations. Abu Sakkar subsequently confirmed to Time magazine that it was him, and explained his reasoning: he said he had found audio recordings on the soldier's phone showing the soldier had participated in torture of civilians, and that this was his response.
The global reaction was immediate and intense. The Assad government — which had by this point used chemical weapons, barrel bombs, and conducted industrial-scale torture in its detention system — used the video to argue that the opposition were terrorists and barbarians. Western governments, which had been debating arming the FSA, cited the video as evidence that the opposition included extremists who could not be trusted with weapons. The FSA's official leadership condemned the act.
Human Rights Watch published a statement condemning the act as a war crime: desecration of a body is prohibited under international humanitarian law regardless of the crimes the dead person may have committed.
Abu Sakkar's explanation — that he had found recordings proving the soldier had tortured people — did not justify what he did, but it placed it in context: this was not a man who had joined the war to commit atrocities. This was a man who had been destroyed by the war, who had lost his neighborhood, his community, and his moral compass in two years of fighting a government that committed far larger atrocities against far more people with far less provocation — and with complete impunity.
The video encapsulated a central truth about the Syrian war: the Assad government's strategy of overwhelming brutality was not only destroying Syrian society physically — it was destroying it morally, producing responses that further undermined the opposition's international legitimacy and gave the regime propaganda tools to use against them.
Confirmed(85%)Sensitivity: medium
Full Source List
01
The fall of Baba Amr: A neighborhood destroyedHuman Rights Watch
Continue the Journey
Explore other journeys in this documentary archive
All Journeys