prison journey
Branch 251: Where Syria's Uprising Was Tortured to Death
The intelligence facility at Al-Khatib where a German court proved crimes against humanity — the first conviction of a Syrian official anywhere in the world.
Confirmed2 chapters2011— 2022
Branch 251 became internationally known through the Koblenz trial in Germany — the first criminal conviction of a Syrian government official for the systematic torture conducted at this facility. This journey documents what happened inside Branch 251 and how survivors' testimony built a case heard across the world.
01
Chapter 01prison event01 / 02
2011-04—2012-09Branch 251, Damascus
The Intake Process
2011–2012 — Damascus
According to testimony presented at the Koblenz trial, Branch 251 functioned as a primary intake and interrogation facility for people arrested at protests or checkpoints during the early months of the Syrian uprising. Detainees were brought blindfolded, stripped of their belongings and identification, and subjected to immediate violent reception: beating, stress positions, and sensory deprivation. According to survivor Wassim Mukdad, who testified at Koblenz, detainees were placed in cells so overcrowded that they had to sleep in shifts. The facility held up to 10 times its intended capacity. Food was withheld systematically. The purpose of the intake process was not information gathering — interrogators already knew why most detainees had been arrested — but degradation and punishment for political activity.
Confirmed(97%)Sensitivity: critical
02
Chapter 02crime allegation02 / 02
2011—2012Branch 251, Damascus
Systematic Torture Methods
2011–2012 — Branch 251
The Koblenz trial systematically documented the torture methods used at Branch 251. According to the court verdict and testimony of 80 witnesses, the following were standard practice: 'German Chair' (al-kursi al-almani) — a metal frame that hyperextends the spine until fracture; electric shock applied to genitals, ears, and fingers; suspension from ceiling by wrists (shabeh); beating with cables and metal rods; forced witness of other detainees' torture; rape and sexual assault used as interrogation tools against both male and female detainees. According to forensic medical expert testimony, many injuries documented were consistent with these methods. The court found that these methods were not aberrational acts of individual officers — they were systematic, organized policy directed by the facility's command structure, including Anwar Raslan.
Confirmed(99%)Sensitivity: critical
Full Source List
01
Testimony of Wassim Mukdad at Koblenz TrialEuropean Center for Constitutional and Human Rights
2021-03-01Continue the Journey
Explore other journeys in this documentary archive
All Journeys