person journey
Kofi Annan: The First Envoy, the First Failure
Confirmed2 chapters
Annan took on the Syria assignment with enormous credibility and good faith. He developed a ceasefire plan, got nominal agreement, and watched it collapse immediately. He resigned after six months, concluding that the international divisions and Assad's intransigence made a negotiated outcome impossible. His failure set the template for every subsequent diplomatic effort in Syria.
01
Chapter 01custom01 / 02
The Six-Point Plan and the Impossible Ceasefire: February–April 2012
Kofi Annan was appointed Joint Special Envoy for Syria on behalf of both the United Nations and the Arab League on February 23, 2012. He came with enormous prestige — as Secretary-General of the UN from 1997 to 2006, he had led the organization through some of its most difficult moments, and his 2001 Nobel Peace Prize gave him unmatched international moral authority.
He arrived in Damascus for talks with Assad in March 2012 — the first senior international figure to engage the Assad government directly as a peace mediator. The Assad government received him formally and presented a cooperative face.
Annan's Six-Point Plan called for:
1. A commitment to work with the Envoy in an inclusive Syrian-led political process
2. A ceasefire and cessation of armed violence in all its forms
3. The Syrian government to ensure timely provision of humanitarian assistance
4. The Syrian government to release arbitrarily detained persons
5. Freedom of movement and access for journalists
6. Respect for freedom of association and the right to demonstrate peacefully
The UN Security Council endorsed the plan. The Assad government nominally agreed to it. A ceasefire went into effect on April 12, 2012.
It lasted hours. The Syrian military continued operations almost immediately. Within days it was clear the ceasefire had collapsed. Assad had used the diplomatic process to buy time, not to genuinely de-escalate.
He arrived in Damascus for talks with Assad in March 2012 — the first senior international figure to engage the Assad government directly as a peace mediator. The Assad government received him formally and presented a cooperative face.
Annan's Six-Point Plan called for:
1. A commitment to work with the Envoy in an inclusive Syrian-led political process
2. A ceasefire and cessation of armed violence in all its forms
3. The Syrian government to ensure timely provision of humanitarian assistance
4. The Syrian government to release arbitrarily detained persons
5. Freedom of movement and access for journalists
6. Respect for freedom of association and the right to demonstrate peacefully
The UN Security Council endorsed the plan. The Assad government nominally agreed to it. A ceasefire went into effect on April 12, 2012.
It lasted hours. The Syrian military continued operations almost immediately. Within days it was clear the ceasefire had collapsed. Assad had used the diplomatic process to buy time, not to genuinely de-escalate.
Confirmed(85%)Sensitivity: medium
02
Chapter 02custom02 / 02
Resignation: August 2, 2012 — 'I Did Not Receive the Support I Needed'
By July 2012, Annan was increasingly vocal about his frustration. The Syrian government had not implemented a single point of his plan. Violence had escalated dramatically — the Houla massacre (May 25, 108 killed, including 49 children) had shocked the world. The UN observer mission deployed to monitor the ceasefire had suspended operations because the violence made their work impossible.
Russia and China continued to block Security Council action, vetoing two draft resolutions in the months since the plan's adoption. The Assad government treated the diplomatic process as cover for continued military operations.
On August 2, 2012, Annan announced his resignation as Special Envoy, effective August 31. His statement was direct and damning:
'Without serious, purposeful and united international pressure — including from the Powers of the region — it is impossible for me, or anyone, to compel the Syrian government in the first place, and also the opposition, to take the steps necessary to begin a political process... Continued backing and arming of the opposition on the one hand, and the lack of firm Security Council action on the other, continue to fuel the internal conflict.'
He added later, in an interview: 'I'm not going to continue if I'm not being supported, if everyone is going their own way.'
Lakhdar Brahimi — the Algerian diplomat who had ended Lebanon's civil war — was appointed as Annan's successor. He too would eventually conclude that the process was going nowhere, and resign in 2014.
Annan's six-month mission was the first demonstration of what would become the defining pattern of Syria diplomacy: the Assad government would participate in diplomatic processes just enough to divide the opposition and delay accountability, while continuing military operations unimpeded. Russia would protect Assad at the Security Council. And no political outcome would be possible.
Russia and China continued to block Security Council action, vetoing two draft resolutions in the months since the plan's adoption. The Assad government treated the diplomatic process as cover for continued military operations.
On August 2, 2012, Annan announced his resignation as Special Envoy, effective August 31. His statement was direct and damning:
'Without serious, purposeful and united international pressure — including from the Powers of the region — it is impossible for me, or anyone, to compel the Syrian government in the first place, and also the opposition, to take the steps necessary to begin a political process... Continued backing and arming of the opposition on the one hand, and the lack of firm Security Council action on the other, continue to fuel the internal conflict.'
He added later, in an interview: 'I'm not going to continue if I'm not being supported, if everyone is going their own way.'
Lakhdar Brahimi — the Algerian diplomat who had ended Lebanon's civil war — was appointed as Annan's successor. He too would eventually conclude that the process was going nowhere, and resign in 2014.
Annan's six-month mission was the first demonstration of what would become the defining pattern of Syria diplomacy: the Assad government would participate in diplomatic processes just enough to divide the opposition and delay accountability, while continuing military operations unimpeded. Russia would protect Assad at the Security Council. And no political outcome would be possible.
Confirmed(85%)Sensitivity: medium
Continue the Journey
Explore other journeys in this documentary archive
All Journeys